♓ 11
This book is not only crazy—but has really weird typography. Throughout the book I kind of grew to like it, but I still am not completely convinced of some of the decisions. The part that is hardest for me to understand is why the footnotes are weird symbols and not numbers, it makes them harder to find and understand. However, the mix of fonts works I think and using a lot of different characters on chapter openers does feel very computer/ robot.

This book is not only crazy—but has really weird typography. Throughout the book I kind of grew to like it, but I still am not completely convinced of some of the decisions. The part that is hardest for me to understand is why the footnotes are weird symbols and not numbers, it makes them harder to find and understand.

However, the mix of fonts works I think and using a lot of different characters on chapter openers does feel very computer/ robot.

  1. genderconfusion reblogged this from typographie
  2. vendettavendetta reblogged this from typographie
  3. libraryland reblogged this from typographie
  4. poptimism reblogged this from typographie and added:
    Haha, this is from my typography class’s flickr group. Every week we’re supposed to post some piece of type and comment...
  5. typographie posted this
-
Sunday, 25th October 2009
#typography #robots #book cover